Showing posts with label enterprise. Show all posts
Showing posts with label enterprise. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Seesmic is focused on social enterprise; Android, iPad Debuts Apps for Salesforce CRM

Leena Rao is currently working as a writer for TechCrunch. She recently finished graduate school Medill School of journalism at Northwestern University, where she studied business journalism and videography. From 2004 to 2007 she helped lead Congresswoman Carloyn Maloney advocacy and community relations in New York. She graduated from Columbia University in 2003, where it was ... ? Read More

seesmic

Social application developer Seesmic makes a big step in social enterprise and debuting dedicated Android app and iPad app for Salesforce CRM product (Windows phone 7 will also be added soon), called Seesmic CRM. Android app will be published tomorrow morning at Salesforce at the annual Conference, Dreamforce and Seesmic launches iPad app within a few weeks.

For the background of Seesmic, which was founded by a French entrepreneur Loic Le Meur, allows you to monitor and follow up the social web. Seesmic desktop, Internet and mobile clients integrate with Twitter, Facebook and other social networks. Bonus using an application like Seesmic is the ability to combine your streams from a variety of social Web services such as YouTube, Foursquare, Techmeme, LinkedIn, and others.

But lately, Seesmic dabbling in the enterprise and launch more focused business functions. Last fall, Seesmic has deep integration with Salesforce enterprise social network chatter. And then earlier this year, Salesforce 4 million Australian dollars round in Seesmic.

Mostly Seesmic Android and iPad apps CRM lead all the functionality of Salesforce CRM for mobile phones. Users can search their Salesforce.com account from native applications; Search for leads, contacts, accounts, related activities and sets of chatter on the move; Creating and updating leads, contacts, tasks, and activities; Log calls and emails after meetings; and much more. And applications use mobile OS; to map users to their respective leads to their current location; upload photos and more. While prices had not been announced yet, Seesmic may charge a fee of $ 10 per month per user for the application.

Le Meur tells us that he does not compete with Salesforce CRM giant, because currently does not offer in-depth Android and iPad apps. In fact, Seesmic is working "hand in hand" with Salesforce mobile group to develop these native apps. And Salesforce particularly bullish on social enterprise at the end — "Welcome to the social enterprise» is the theme of the Dreamforce this year. As Le Meur said: "we are working with Salesforce, not compete with the company."

Of course it's interesting that Twitter's developer platform is shifting focus from building consumer and focusing on the enterprise. In March, Twitter basically told developers avoid compete with them on their own customers. It's not that Twitter doesn't want developers to build off their platform, they simply do not want developers to create clients that simulate Twitter's own services.

Thus Seesmic found new user base in the area of business. Le Meur explains that the use of mobile and social enterprise of the future for Seesmic. While the startup will not relinquish their Web and mobile applications (Android app company has more than one million users); all efforts of Seesmic now completely focused on attracting social for business users, "said Le million euros.

Seesmic BlackBerry app shuttered a few months ago. You can watch Le million euros in a recent conversation with TechCrunch TV Andrew Kina here.

(Disclosure: TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington was an early investor in Seesmic.)


Seesmic is a powerful set of social media and collaboration tools that provide businesses and individuals with everything they need to build and manage their brands online. WITH ...

Read More

View the original article here

Sunday, August 28, 2011

Good luck in the first place, the glory later — why you should aim for the enterprise

Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 1, position 9032.
Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 1, position 15264.
Geoff McQueen

Editors Note: This is a guest post written by Geoff McQueen, the cofounder of AffinityLive, a business management platform for professional services. McQueen recently moved to San Francisco from Australia.

Who doesn’t get excited about the consumer web? Google, Facebook, Twitter, Zynga, Foursquare. Billions in revenue, Hollywood movies, overturning indistries, and curing boredom. So it is natural then as a startup entrepreneur that you’d first think about doing a consumer web product. But as someone who’s been a tech entrepreneur for a decade outside the Valley, the one thing we’re not told is that unless you’re in one of four or five places on the planet, you’re almost certainly doomed to fail in the consumer web.

Why? Because consumer web plays, for all their allure, require two ingredients you’re not going to find in Sydney, Vancouver, London, Johannesburg, or pretty much anywhere else: they need big markets and big money.

Big Markets

In the United States, if you want to reach a million users in a consumer play, you need to convince one in 260 people to use your product. In China, you’ve got to get just under one in 400 people to get on board. But if your startup is pitching to users in the UK, you’ve got to achieve more than 5 times the penetration of the US. The same goes for France—it might be close to the UK, but as a market it might as well be in another galaxy. Germany is only slightly better. And in my homeland, Australia, you’ve got to achieve almost 20 times the penetration as in the US—to get to a million users, you need to be able to convince 5 people on that bus you caught to the city to use your product—profitably, and scalable across the entire market.

Given that the economics of most consumer web plays are based on selling access to an audience, if you’re not in a big market, you’re pretty much screwed. Which is why unless you are in Silicon Valley, New York, Shanghai, Mumbai or perhaps São Paulo the deck is stacked very much against you.

Big Money

If the consumer web requires big scale, achieving scale requires big money. Sure, the cloud and lean startup principles have cut the capital requirements a lot, but to succeed you need to get to millions of users, with dozens or hundreds of staff, with little to no real income (since your users aren’t paying you).

Most venture money isn’t dumb, so if you want to raise consumer web funds, you’ll need to head to one of the handful of places in the world to get it. This isn’t a bad thing—it is just reality. Entrepreneurs all over the world bemoan how hard it is to raise capital, yet we are reading constantly about the bubble.

Of course there’s an exception here if you were to create the next Facebook, Twitter or Foursquare and grow it virally, but that’s really a one in a million shot on its own, and even those companies required serious levels of funding to scale before they were able to pull in revenue.

The Alternative

Of course, the most obvious solution to this problem is to move to one of the few places in the world where you stand a chance of building a consumer web business. But it isn’t possible for every entrepreneur in the world to do that, and places like Silicon Valley have their own pitfalls, like trying to hire an engineering team when Google, Facebook and others are waging a war for talent.

If you’re thinking about what to do for your next venture, my opinion is that you are better off looking to businesses as your users. Here’s why.

Businesses Spend Money

The biggest reason why business customers make a great market for your startup is that they have money, and aren’t afraid to spend it to solve a real problem. There are lots of unsolved problems in business today in areas such as sales, marketing, finance, operations, management and more where technology can be disruptive and highly valuable.

As we all know, consumers have pretty tough expectations of value when it comes to parting with money—one of my favorite consumer services, TripIt, costs less for a year than the price of the cab to the airport for one flight, and still a very small minority of people pay.

On the other hand, businesses have a stronger ‘investment’ mentality when it comes to their decision making. The nexus between money spent and value received is still largely intact, and if a business finds an online product or service valuable and starts to rely on it, not paying for it can make them worry that it is unreliable or going to disappear on them without notice.
A target market with problems that need solving and a willingness to pay doesn’t necessarily mean there’s an opportunity for startups.  Tech giants like Microsoft, Oracle, HP, Adobe and many others have massive advantages of incumbency over new, smaller, emerging players. But changes in the expectations of businesses—thanks ironically to the consumer web—are making it much easier for a startup to take on the big boys.

Innovation Expectations

While the power of incumbency and size might be true for the big corporates, in the small and medium segment—which is a much bigger market—there’s an opportunity to run circles around the big guys. With the possible exception of SalesForce, almost all of the incumbents are hamstrung by bloated and high-cost sales models, monolithic, bureaucratic product development and release cycles, and in many cases the innovators dilemma.

While saying they can’t move as fast as a startup is a truism, what matters is whether their customers want them to move faster. And in my experience, they absolutely do.
Business people are consumers too, and they’re being spoiled by the pace of innovation they’re experiencing in their personal lives. The smartphone wielding-CEO, who adopted Facebook without “training” and “change management”, and who uses Skype to talk to his travelling daughter, is the norm, even if he or she still types with two fingers. Business people like this aren’t happy to wait 18-24 months for the next major release from Microsoft or Oracle to catch up with personal tech they’ve been using for a couple of years already.

These new expectations about the pace of innovation are making it much easier for startups to compete.

New Distribution Platforms

All of this sounds good, but aren’t business web plays expensive too? You’ve got to build sales, marketing and distribution, which surely costs a ton, right? Not necessarily. There are an increasing number of emerging platforms for the business web which are helping startups scale without the traditional enterprise sales and marketing costs.

The Google App Marketplace and Salesforce App Exchange as distribution platforms are making it easier for developers and startups to connect to markets in the same way the mobile markets do. They make going to market at scale more affordable than ever.

Additionally, the disruptive effect of the Cloud technology and SaaS business model has meant value added resellers (VARs) around the world are having to rethink their business models. Smart ones are basing their businesses on consulting, support, and training rather than just selling licenses at a margin; the lower prices and subscription revenue model means VARs can’t survive just by clipping the ticket on a sale.

The smart VARs are actively looking to develop partnerships with startups so they can offer their solutions to clients. For a startup, this provides the opportunity to distribute their services and cultivate the kind of face-to-face sales and support network many businesses want in a very fast, capital efficient way.

What about mobile?

In some ways, mobile apps have more in common with business web plays even though they’re mostly targeted at consumers. Users are conditioned to pay for apps. Often they’re solving a problem, whether it be productive or entertaining. Mobile of course has built-in distribution, which is why we’re seeing so many successful mobile plays from outside the traditional startup hubs; Rovio from Finland, Firemint from Melbourne and dozens more examples bear this out—geography doesn’t have to be as much of a disadvantage in mobile either.

The consumer web, with its bigger markets and consumer appeal will of course continue to get most of the headlines, particularly in the techo chamber of Silicon Valley. But while we’re obsessing about the next social location photo platform, companies like Australia’s Atlassian, Chicago’s 37 Signals, London’s Huddle, New Zealand’s Xero and hundreds of others will keep booking hundreds of million in revenue from business customers all over the world. Which is why I encourage you to look to businesses as your market when you’re doing your next startup.

Photo Credit/Flickr/eleaf


Geoff McQueen is the Founder and Managing Director of Hiive Systems, the company behind AffinityLive. He is also the founder of Internetrix, a Google partner and successful website performance...

Learn more

View the original article here

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Social enterprise company Jive files for IPO of $ 100 m; 2010 Year income totaled $ 46 m

Leena Rao is currently working as a writer for TechCrunch. She recently finished graduate school Medill School of journalism at Northwestern University, where she studied business journalism and videography. From 2004 to 2007 she helped lead Congresswoman Carloyn Maloney advocacy and community relations in New York. She graduated from Columbia University in 2003, where it was ... ? Read More

jive-software

Social Enterprise giant Jive has just filed its S-1 and increase as much as $ 100 million in hosting.

Modeled to offer Facebook such opportunities to enterprises, Jive Software combines computing with social interactions offer full-fledged social networking for business. Suite Help business collaborate on various tasks, including discussions, communication, exchange of documents, blogs, polls, and social networking features and more.

Some of the key information in respect to revenue. For the period ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, and for the six months ended June 30, 2011, Jive, raising $ 16.9 million income million, $ 46.3 million and 34.0 million, respectively.

The company actually took the loss in 2008, 2009, 2010 and a six-month period ending in June 2011. Loss appears to actually increase — the company lost $ 27.6 million in 2010, and $30,6 million this year. The company says that it continues to invest revenues back into infrastructure, development and sales and marketing and expects that operating expenses increased significantly.

Jive also said that he was switching their clients DATA from third-party service provider for the blend Fund managed by Jive's own network operations, which will require significant capital.

From June 30, 2011, Jive has 635 corporate clients, including Hewlett-Packard Company, SAP AG, T-Mobile and UBS AG, with more than 15 million users. Currently, the company had 358 staff on June 30, 2011 year.

Jive, said that he plans to use proceeds from the offering to repay outstanding loans (20 million United States dollars) and for general corporate purposes, including working capital and potential acquisitions.

From the point of view of the Jive raised total investment 57 million dollars and the company's largest investor Sequoia Capital owns more than a third of Jive (36 per cent). Kleiner Perkins owns 14.24% Jive.


View the original article here

Friday, August 12, 2011

Andreessen Horowitz, Greylock, put $ 16. 5 m in Enterprise cloud management application run Okta

Leena Rao is currently working as a writer for TechCrunch. She recently finished graduate school of the Medill School of journalism at Northwestern University, where she studied business journalism and videography. From 2004 to 2007 she helped lead efforts for advocacy and community relationships Congressman Carloyn Maloney in New York. She graduated from Columbia University in 2003 where it was ... ? Read More

okta

Enterprise cloud app management company Okta was raised to $ 16.5 million in series b funding from Greylock Partners, Andreessen Horowitz, and gateway. This brings the company's total funding to $ 28 million.

Okta is a cloud management applications. Okta in platform enables companies to have control over their users, applications, and data in the cloud, and outside of the firewall. Startup was founded by Todd McKinnon, former Vice President of the engineers of the most successful cloud-based companies to date, Salesforce.

As Mckinnon said us Okta provides a platform for companies to manage corporate it. He explains that traditional security platform and management are not going to work with the Cloud. When you move to the cloud, IT administrators face the challenge of ensuring and monitoring users and access, simplify adoption and scalability of these applications, and at the same time to ensure that business is optimizing applications in the cloud.

Companies that use cloud-based applications like Salesforce and Google Apps must identity and directory services in the cloud as a place where they can store user profiles and more. Okta gives it managers the ability to maintain one central directory and repeat this for all cloud applications.

The company is releasing a product to the public in January. McKinnon said he initially thought customers would be small and medium-sized businesses, but recently saw acquisitions in large companies using Okta. Companies using Okta include Enterasys Networks, Pandora, T.D.Williamson, AMAG pharmaceuticals, etc. The company says that dramatically ramped up use Okta in on-demand service for authentication over 1 million per month.

And Mckinnon provides more Empire cloud services that "the ability of enterprises to overcome barriers to the adoption of the cloud".

Ben Horowitz, who headed the company's series a round, said about Okta: Okta in original product aims to solve the problem of identity in the cloud. I love this problem, because it is very different in the cloud is local and for new companies, as well. He belivees that the market potential is huge, "because the identity of the cloud market will likely become a cloud management market. Given that these current market combined is between $ 10B and $ 20B (depending on what you count) market is extremely large. "

The new funds will be used for sales and marketing efforts, as well as for ramping up distribution. Within this transaction David Weiden better enterprises will become a consultant to the Board, and Aneel Bhusri, co-founder and co-CEO, Okta will join the Board of Directors.


Okta is the market leading on-demand identity and access management service enables enterprises to accelerate their safe adoption of their Web applications in the cloud and beyond ...

Read More

View the original article here

Monday, August 8, 2011

Construction of enterprise software companies do not suck

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

Editor’s note: Guest author Aaron Levie is the founder and CEO of Box.net

Thomas Wailgum, an editor at CIO.com, summed up the enterprise software industry best when he wrote, “It might appear that even tobacco companies enjoy a better level of overall ‘likeability’ than do enterprise software vendors.”

The way successful enterprise software companies have historically operated has been more or less uncontested: licensing costs increase at regular intervals, technology is difficult to integrate, and the user experience is often atrocious. Unlike most other open markets, which force out negative behaviors over time, many of the practices in place today serve the vendor and customer asymmetrically. Amazingly, more than 40% of IT projects still fail to deliver the expected business ROI, yet enterprise vendors come out winning regardless.

But not for long. Now that enterprise software can be delivered over the web and iterated quickly, we’re seeing the barriers for development, distribution and adoption shrink to levels previously only witnessed by consumer internet companies, with millions of users on top of platforms like Yammer, Box, and Zendesk; these changes are creating a much more competitive landscape where the customer stands to gain tremendously. The values that now separate legacy vendors from a new breed of companies are not only technological, but also cultural and organizational. In short, building better enterprise technology requires that we build fundamentally different enterprise technology companies.

Creating amazing products, not amazing RFP responses

Enterprise software vendors have long enjoyed a counterintuitive, but highly lucrative, reward system. Its buyers are different from the ultimate users, and each group’s needs are radically different — traditionally, enterprise technology has been designed with the sale to the CIO in mind, and this produces solutions that are inevitably feature-bloated to “satisfy” the vast majority of a customer’s requirements.

This has created an oddly perverse dynamic where the vendors with the most feature-rich solutions win the contracts, but the users lose due to the complexity of the technology. And thanks to the incredibly long gaps between product releases, vendors are further motivated to cram as many features as possible into each version, hoping to check all the boxes on RFPs for the next few years.

So how do new entrants avoid this cycle all together? By focusing on building enterprise software that the users love, driving demand up to the CIO. Vendors like Workday, Jive, Yammer, or Rypple are responding by investing more in design, usability, openness, and the total user experience. They’re measuring success by user adoption, rather than feature checklists. And thankfully, buyers are catching on.

At Box, we now see RFPs where “user adoption” is a heavily weighted factor in the purchasing decision; this was virtually unheard of a few years ago. IT managers are realizing that there are better, more strategic uses of their time than training employees, fighting low adoption, and contending with angry users – they want technology that just works. And because of this, we’re seeing more alignment between users and the CIO than ever before.

Maintaining a hacker-centric engineering culture

Paul Graham wrote a great essay last year on the need for hacker-centric cultures, where he ostensibly attributed Yahoo’s decline to their failure to build an engineering-driven organization. Enterprise software companies are uniquely vulnerable to the tendency of losing their edge in this way. For many enterprise software startups, survival mode kicks in and the market forces them to trade their product vision for more immediate, realistic revenue opportunities. But roadmaps driven by the goal of winning bake-offs or a few exceptional clients are the quickest way to kill the engineering spirit in your organization and turn away strong talent.

Today, the size and scope of the markets that even the tiniest enterprise startup can go after, and the amount of data and tools at their fingertips, are unprecedented. And because new software entrants are moving at web-speed, the challenges and rewards of building for the enterprise are drawing a new crop of developers. We speak with prospective engineers that hold the latest group of enterprise software startups, like Asana or PBworks, in the same regard as Facebook or Zynga because the ethos are now remarkably similar (minus the farm animals).

When business applications are delivered over the web, releases often occur on a weekly (or daily) basis – far from the standard three year cycle experienced by those working for Microsoft and most incumbent enterprise software companies. Engineers get to see their projects come to life immediately, and the organization benefits from instant product feedback.

Try performing A/B tests on a Siebel system or Lotus 10 to 15 years ago, or pulling customer activity in real-time to drive product decisions. It simply wasn’t possible. Or, just imagine what enterprise software would look like if all enterprise vendors implemented Google’s 20% time, or quarterly hackathons?.

Building radically different enterprise sales

The new approach to building and delivering enterprise software also entails a very different sales process. With web-delivered, freemium or open source solutions, we’re seeing viral, bottom-up adoption of technology across organizations of all sizes. And while the ultimate buyer remains the same (as Ben Horowitz has pointed out), the chief adopters of technology are now the individuals within an organization looking for quick, easy ways to solve their most pressing business problems. With the freemium model in particular, software companies now have an incredibly scalable and qualified lead generation vehicle; your sales team doesn’t have to bang on the doors of unsuspecting and uninterested buyers, because your prospects are already familiar, and likely successful, with your product.

This is also changing enterprise software buying patterns. Enterprises are tired of six to twelve month sales cycles that leave them with a solution that ultimately fails to gain traction. They’re beginning to focus on working with technology that their employees are already using or familiar with. This model forces the sales organization to stay honest, as customers generally have to be “bought” into the product before they’ve technically paid anything.

Consequently, enterprise sales tactics and techniques reminiscent of Alec Baldwin in Glengarry Glen Ross are becoming as quaint as the mainframe. The sales organization isn’t going anywhere, it’s just focused on ensuring that customers are blown away by its products; and the focus is on building a department that is knowledgeable, consultative and friendly, focused on helping the customer navigate from being an early adopter to large scale

Taking responsibility for customer success and support

Finally, the enterprise software industry has become too wedded to a model where the success of the vendor is disconnected from customer success. Traditionally, as soon as an enterprise software sale is made, it becomes the buyer’s responsibility to support the purchase – often requiring the manpower of a 6 and 7-figure consulting engagement. For instance, Microsoft touts that nearly 80% of SharePoint deployments involve a partner in some capacity, and there’s a 6:1 ratio of dollars spent on services to the cost of the original licenses. While that’s great for the partner ecosystem, it means customers have no predictability in what they’ll ultimately be paying.

This too is changing. With the new wave of enterprise software companies, customers are no longer solely financially responsible for the victorious implementation of their purchased solutions. The unstoppable trend toward “renting” vs. “buying” software, means the vendor gets paid only as the software continues to solve problems for its customer. As forcing functions go, this is a pretty good one to ensure customers are happy — and it means implementation services, constant feedback loops, and deep customer engagement are all critical to successful retention.

And while we’re at it, customers should no longer have to pay dearly for vendor support. What if every enterprise technology company demonstrated a Zappos-like devotion to customer satisfaction? We’re already seeing this today with Rackspace eeking out extra margin with their fanatical support mantra. In the next generation enterprise software company, the customer support and services organizations are more important than ever before – committed to the success of customers throughout the entire life of product ownership.

The new rules of enterprise software are about delivering substantially better products and services, and aligning customers with buyers in unprecedented ways. We’ve already seen how quickly new solutions that are customer-focused can emerge within big and small businesses alike: Salesforce.com built an $20B market-cap company in a little over a decade with incredible customer success and satisfaction. The emergence of new enterprise platforms, and the amount of investment in and demand for these new tools, are going to dramatically change the competitive landscape for software providers. Startups, and even larger companies, that play by the new rules and understand the change taking place, will succeed. Ultimately, though, it’s customers that are the biggest winners, and my god has it taken a while for customers to win when it comes to their IT purchases.

After starting as a college business project in 2005, Box.net was officially launched in March of 2006 with the vision of connecting people, devices and networks. Box.net provides more...

Learn more

View the original article here

Sunday, August 7, 2011

Zendesk brings SaaS to the enterprise customer service

Leena Rao is currently working as a writer for TechCrunch. She recently finished graduate school of the Medill School of journalism at Northwestern University, where she studied business journalism and videography. From 2004 to 2007 she helped lead efforts for advocacy and community relationships Congressman Carloyn Maloney in New York. She graduated from Columbia University in 2003 where it was ... ? Read More

Zendesk Picture-1

Zendesk customer support starts going after enterprise customers with the launch of the new decision, taking into account the large organizations. Established in 2008, Zendesk offers Web, SaaS delivered advisory/support tickets application that gives companies an easy way to manage incoming requests support from end customers.

Zendesk in new enterprise-class features include unlimited internal use, so large customers can include company-wide insight into the operation of the service. The company has also established a specialized platform for parent companies with multiple brands, you can centralize their support groups, while maintaining the brand of the client before the support portal.

Organizations can also customize permission levels for a group of agents, allowing or restricting access to certain features in Zendesk, such as access to the private comments or
channels, or the ability to change the field ticket. And customer support interaction could be archived automatically.

To date, Zendesk has added more than 10 000 clients. The company claims that some of these clients are big companies, but this is the first time that Zendesk offers plan and platform that is specifically tailored to meet the needs of security and enterprise scale company. Prices for an enterprise plan starts at $ 99 for the agent.

Zendesk raises $ 26 million to date from Matrix partners, benchmark capital and Charles River Ventures.


View the original article here